On January 11, 2012, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled in favor of TC client Hosanna-Tabor in Hosanna-Tabor Evangelical Lutheran Church and School v. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, et al. For the first time, the U.S. Supreme Court acknowledged the “ministerial exception," a doctrine grounded in the First Amendment and developed by the U.S. Courts of Appeal as a bar to claims by ministers and other religious leaders under employment-discrimination laws.
Chief Justice John G. Roberts wrote in the opinion and the court held that both the Establishment Clause and the Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment prohibit the government from interfering with a church’s determination of who will serve as its minister.
Partner Sherri Strand first became involved in the case after the adverse ruling by the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, which held that the ministerial exception did not apply to the claim of a commissioned minister against her former employer, Hosanna-Tabor, because she spent more time teaching secular subjects than religion.
Thompson Coburn filed a Motion for a Rehearing in the Sixth Circuit. Later, the firm , along with co-counsel Douglas Laycock, a professor at the University of Virginia and a leading scholar in religious liberty, and the Beckett Fund, a public interest nonprofit firm in D.C., filed the Petition for Certiorari in the U.S. Supreme Court. Strand and Erwin assisted with all briefs filed on behalf of Hosanna-Tabor and Strand appeared before the Supreme Court during oral argument with Professor Laycock on October 5, 2011.
Various media outlets have written about the case, which has been described as the most important religious freedom case to be decided by the U.S. Supreme Court in decades, and one which benefits all religious organizations in America.
Click below to read news coverage of the case:
New York Times
Bloomberg BNA - Daily Labor Report
Reporter, the Official Newspaper of the Lutheran Church-Missouri Synod
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.