University of Wisconsin-Madison,
Washington University in St. Louis School of Law,
Order of the Coif
Associate Editor, Washington University Law Quarterly
Thompson Coburn LLP
Peper, Martin, Jensen, Maichel and Hetlage
Washington University in St. Louis School of Law
Professor of Law, Associate Dean, 1964-1973
Lewis provides human resources counseling to clients, with a focus on ERISA litigation.
His ERISA cases have included issues concerning redemption valuations for ESOPS, termination of retiree medical benefits, cash balance retirement accounts, alleged anti-cutback violations, and the scope of ERISA preemption.
Some of his non-ERISA cases have involved alleged sexual discrimination and harassment, alleged age discrimination, the doctrine of equivalents in patent law, the scope of the Securities Law Uniform Standards Act (15 U.S.C. §78bb), and the validity of the St. Louis Gas Transportation Tax.
In his more than 50 years of practice, Lewis also has had considerable experience in appellate litigation, corporate and securities law, alternative dispute resolution, and general business matters.
"Laches in ERISA Litigation";
DRI - The Voice, April 29, 2009
"Marketability Discounts in ESOP Redemptions: Armstrong v. LaSalle Bank Nat. Ass'n" (with Richard J. Pautler);
20 Benefits Law Journal 31, 2007
"A Third Form of ERISA Preemption: Aetna Health Inc. v. Davila" (co-author Richard J. Pautler);
Benefits Law Journal, Vol. 18, No. 1, Spring 2005
“Pendent Jurisdiction and Extraterritorial Service Under the Federal Securities Law”;
70 Columbia L. Rev. 423, 1970
“The Mathematics of Cumulative Voting”;
Duke L.J. 28, 1968
“The Public Purpose Doctrine in Wisconsin”;
Wisconsin L. Rev. 40, 282, 1957
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.