Washington University in St. Louis School of Law,
Developments Editor, Washington University Journal of Urban and Contemporary Law
University of Iowa,
Listed in "The Best Lawyers in America®", 2014-Present
Thompson Coburn LLP
Management Committee, 2016-Present
Hiring Chair, 2011-Present
United States District Court (Eastern District of Missouri)
Law Clerk to Hon. George F. Gunn, Jr., 1997-1998
Law Clerk to Hon. Charles A. Shaw, 1997
Law Clerk to Hon. Catherine D. Perry, 1997
Missouri Office of Chief Disciplinary Counsel
Chair, Region XI Disciplinary Committee (by appointment of the Missouri Supreme Court)
National Kidney Foundation
Board of Directors, The Soulard School
Steve represents corporations in large-scale business and regulatory disputes and defends individuals and corporations in criminal cases and proceedings in federal and state court, and before the Securities and Exchange Commission, state regulatory agencies, and FINRA.
His commercial litigation experience includes representing telecommunications companies in regulatory disputes and litigation over construction, privacy, and commercial matters; representation of civic groups in election and redistricting matters; and representation of a variety of companies in trade secret litigation.
As the vice chair of Thompson Coburn's White Collar Defense and Investigations practice group, Steve primarily focuses on securities matters and has helped companies successfully resolve regulatory investigations without facing criminal charges, paying fines, or admitting any wrongdoing.
His white collar defense experience includes the successful representation of Charter Communications, Inc., in a two-year accounting fraud investigation brought by the U.S. Department of Justice and the SEC. Steve represents public companies, broker-dealers, and financial advisors before the SEC and state regulatory agencies. He has also tried numerous broker-dealer disputes before FINRA.
Steve has extensive experience conducting internal investigations. He also frequently counsels businesses in compliance matters, including the creation and monitoring of corporate compliance and record retention programs.
Representation of a major telecommunications and cloud solutions provider in a False Claims Act matter that resulted in no charges, no fines, no penalties, and no finding of wrongdoing.
Representation of a client in a joint DOJ/SEC investigation that resulted in no charges being brought.
Representation of North Carolina and South Carolina public service commissions in the investigation of accounting fraud allegations against Duke Energy. The inquiry resulted in Duke paying a $25 million fine to regulators.
Obtained judgment at trial for U.S. Bancorp Community Development Corporation in a partnership dispute concerning a large apartment development financed through federal tax credits.
Successful representation of Charter Communications in a significant legal malpractice case filed against one of its former transactional law firms. The suit, which sought $150 million in damages, was one of the largest legal malpractice cases brought anywhere in the country.
Obtained judgment at trial on behalf of citizens challenging St. Louis County's redistricting plan.
"The Anti-Spoofing Provision of the Dodd-Frank Act: New White Collar Crime or ‘Spoof' of Law?"
The St. Louis Bar Journal Winter, 2016
"What to do When the Government Decides to Investigate," Co-presenter,
Association of Corporate Counsel Institute April, 2016
Co-Presenter, "Who's Afraid of E-Discovery . . . Not I";
Bar Association of St. Louis Federal Practice Seminar, March 2009
Co-Presenter, "Practical E-Discovery, or What's Under the Hood";
Eighth Circuit Judicial Conference, August, 2008
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.