Skip Navigation LinksServices > Litigation > Toxic Tort


Toxic Tort

  • OVERVIEW
  • PROFESSIONALS
Thompson Coburn’s Toxic Tort attorneys first gained national recognition in the mid-1980s, when they defended Monsanto in several mass dioxin cases. One of those cases, Kemner v. Monsanto Co., brought by 65 plaintiffs, is the longest jury trial in U.S. history. Monsanto paid no damages in that case, and following its conclusion all of the remaining plaintiffs, numbering several hundred, voluntarily dismissed their cases without receiving a cent.

Since then, we have handled thousands of toxic tort cases for chemical and petroleum companies, agribusinesses, railroads and others. We have earned a reputation for achieving outstanding results both in settlement and at trial, a notable achievement because many of these cases were brought in the City of St. Louis and the Illinois counties of Madison and St. Clair, which have a history of substantial plaintiff verdicts.

We have successfully defended toxic tort cases throughout the country, including in Arizona, California, Colorado, Louisiana, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, Nevada, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming. In addition, we have served as national counsel to companies in the rail, automobile and general manufacturing industries in more than 20 states.

Paul M. Brown

314.552.6016

Richard S. Cornfeld

314.552.6023
  • Allied Signal Corp.
  • American Commercial Line LLC
  • American Cyanamid
  • Ashland Oil Co.
  • ContiGroup Companies, Inc.
  • E.I du Pont de Nemours and Co.
  • ExxonMobil Corp.
  • Fina Oil and Chemical
  • Kansas City Southern Railway Co.
  • Norfolk Southern Corp.
  • Peabody Holding Co., Inc.
  • Premium Standard Farms
  • Sedgwick James of Tennessee
  • BNSF Railway
  • The Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
  • Union Pacific Railroad
  • United Industries
  • Our client won a summary judgment after excluding the plaintiffs’ experts in a multi-plaintiff case alleging brain damage due to organic solvents. The Ninth Circuit’s affirmance of that order is one of the major post-Daubert decisions.
  • On behalf of our client, we sued in federal court to bar the plaintiffs’ expert in a 40-plaintiff state-court brain damage case. The day we obtained the injunction barring the expert’s testimony, the plaintiffs' lawyer called and settled.
  • After securing a Lone Pine order against residents claiming groundwater contamination, we obtained a voluntary dismissal for our client when the plaintiffs could not produce causation evidence.