In the absence of clear regulatory guidance for the burgeoning crypto finance industry, the SEC’s new Chairman, Gary Gensler, has made it clear that his agency is going to take an expansive role in regulating crypto platforms.
Chair Gensler made his intentions clear in an August 2021 letter to his longtime ally Sen. Elizabeth Warren. He asserted that the test to determine whether a crypto asset is a security is clear and that crypto platforms “must work within our securities regime.” Gensler also encouraged Warren to push for new legislation to expand enforcement authority. “Regulators would benefit from additional plenary authority to write rules for and attach guardrails to crypto trading and lending,” he wrote.
How has this enforcement priority played out for the companies offering crypto platforms and products? One example is the SEC’s actions concerning Coinbase, the largest digital-currency exchange in the U.S., which resulted in confusion and frustration. Earlier this year the SEC effectively prevented Coinbase from launching a new product called Lend, which allows users to earn interest on certain digital assets on the platform.
The company announced the creation of Lend in June 2021, which prompted the SEC to launch an investigation, delaying the rollout of the product. Paul Grewal, Coinbase’s chief legal officer, told the Financial Times in September that the SEC had pronounced Lend to be a security “but wouldn’t say why or how they’d reached that conclusion.” The agency also declined to give the company guidance on how the Lend product could be made compliant with existing SEC regulations, Grewal said.
Issuing legal threats for financial products that have not yet been released. Keeping crypto products off the market without setting clear rules. This is not the way the market should be regulated. The SEC should provide clear, detailed guidance to the industry so companies like Coinbase can continue to develop innovative products while remaining in compliance with securities laws.
And the SEC is not the only regulator scrutinizing crypto platforms. In testimony for his confirmation as chair of the CFTC, Commissioner Rostin Behnam said the Senate should consider expanding the CFTC’s jurisdiction over digital tokens. “We’ve been one of the few cops on the beat because of limited statutory authority related to anti-fraud and anti-manipulation,” Behnam told lawmakers.
Here are other recent aggressive actions taken on financial products:
With multiple regulators policing the industry, it’s an extremely important for everyone in this space to consider the regulatory landscape before launching a new product or service. In our experience, the prudent approach is to be proactive. Until federal agencies give better guidance, ask your legal counsel to open discussions with relevant regulators before your product goes to market. Even if you don’t have a product set to launch, if your organization has a stake in how crypto products are regulated, now is the time to make your views known to the SEC, CFTC, and other regulators.
Renato Mariotti is a Chicago partner in Thompson Coburn’s White Collar Defense and Investigations group. As a federal prosecutor with the Securities and Commodities Fraud section of the U.S. Attorneys’ Office, he tried and won the first spoofing prosecution. Holly Campbell is a Chicago associate in Thompson Coburn’s White Collar Defense and Investigations group. She defends clients who are subjects of DOJ, SEC, CFTC and other regulatory enforcement actions.
NOTICE.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that
doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited
information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information
about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from
us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.