Litigation partner Kim Bousquet recently published an article on litigation strategies for higher education institutions facing lawsuits from students. The article, "Recent Cases Addressing the Educational Malpractice Doctrine: Three Key Lessons for Defending Against Student Claims," appears in the April 2016 issue of Career Education Review, a publication read by CEOs, presidents, owners, and other top management leaders in the career education sector.
The article focuses on a fairly recent trend of graduates filing suit against higher education institutions, alleging they are unable to obtain employment because their education was deficient.
Previously, postsecondary institutions could rely on the firm standing of the education malpractice doctrine, which generally dictates that claims based on alleged poor quality of education are not actionable as a matter of law. But these suits have evolved to include complaints increasingly focused on an institution’s representations regarding courses, degrees, job placement, or certification.
As Kim writes, “Claims that once would have been recognized immediately as general complaints about quality of education are now disguised under various legal theories in an effort to avoid invoking the educational malpractice doctrine.”
Kim’s article explores recent cases that have attempted to repackage education malpractice claims into various types of breach of contract or fraud actions, offers “lessons learned,” and discusses methods for effectively using the education malpractice doctrine to defend against such claims.
Kim also spun off the article into a three-part series on Thompson Coburn's REGucation blog:
Education malpractice and student litigation: New lessons learned
Identify and expose educational malpractice claims masquerading as negligence, breach of contract, or other legal theories.
Education malpractice and student litigation: How to assess claims
The educational malpractice doctrine covers a wide array of factual assertions — know what allegations to look for. The doctrine may apply even when the claims are not directly tied to allegations of poor education, but nonetheless implicate school policies or judgment calls.
Education malpractice and student litigation: Achieving early dismissal
When the allegations invoke educational policies, principles, practices, theories, or implementation thereof, it may be wise to move to dismiss the relevant claims at the pleading stage.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.