Saint Louis University School of Law,
J.D., magna cum laude, 1995
Order of the Woolsack
Alpha Sigma Nu National Honor Society
University of Missouri,
M.A., Political Science, 1992
University of Illinois,
B.S., B.A., Cum Laude, 1984
Missouri Bar Association
The Bar Association of Metropolitan St. Louis
Illinois State Bar Association
City of Chicago
Illinois Central Railroad
Metropolitan Sewer District
Monro Muffler Brake
Sho-Me Power Electric Cooperative
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
Listed in Missouri & Kansas Super Lawyers, 2012-2014
Thompson Coburn LLP
Laclede Gas Company
Corporate Budgeting, Employee Benefits, Marketing, 1985-1990
Mary Ryder Home
Board Member, 2012-Present
St. Gabriel the Archangel School
Board Member, 2010-2013
Bob has more than 20 years of experience defending class actions in state and federal courts across the country.
As co-chair of Thompson Coburn's Class Action practice group, Bob has represented telecommunication companies, retailers, manufacturers, banks, railroads, public transit authorities, governmental entities, electric and agricultural cooperatives and energy companies in all aspects of the class action litigation process, from the initial responsive pleading through the class action trial. Bob has litigated class actions in 20 states and has argued more than 25 class certification hearings and participated in more than 100 certification rulings.
His areas of substantive law include consumer fraud, product liability, telecommunications, environmental, banking, tax, data privacy, securities, eminent domain and employment law. Approximately 75 percent of his practice involves class actions. The remainder consists of general business litigation-type cases between companies and their customers, suppliers, employees and shareholders.
Prior to becoming a lawyer, Bob earned a business degree and worked in accounting and employee benefits administration for a regulated utility. This experience carries over into Bob's law practice, where he particularly enjoys learning about and defending challenged business practices.
Obtained dismissal of telecommunications class action for lack of Article III standing pursuant to Spokeo v. Robins.
Secured summary judgment and defeated motion for class certification on claims brought against car repair shop fee.
Secured ruling in St. Louis County denying motion to certify class of property owners whose homes were damaged by overland flooding.
Defeated motion to certify nationwide "junk fax" class action.
Obtained Illinois Supreme Court reversal of class certification of alleged personal injury and property damage claims arising from nearby train derailment.
Successfully asserted dilatory and peremptory exceptions on claims brought by 278 individuals in Louisiana state court alleging personal injuries from outdoor gas main leak.
Secured affirmance of ERISA plan administrator's decision to deny benefits based on reasonableness of administrator's interpretation of plan language.
Obtained dismissal of class action claims brought by drinking water well owners who failed to allege credible fear that gasoline additive threatened their wells.
Defeated class action fraud and RICO claims based on federal preemption and the named plaintiff's inability to prove that the unit he purchased failed to perform as advertised.
Successfully asserted doctrine of primary jurisdiction to defeat class action filed against regulated utility.
Obtained dismissal of late fee class action based on the common law defense of voluntary payment.
Secured Rule 11 sanctions against plaintiff's attorney for filing frivolous RESPA class action.
"How Local Charities Can Benefit From Your Cy Pres Settlements";
St. Louis Lawyer, September, 2011
Co-Author, “The Attorneys’ Fee Award in Class Action Litigation – Is the Carrot Too Big?”;
St. Louis Lawyer, November 1999
Co-Author, “New Federal Law May Cool Class Action Hotbeds”;
Midwest In-House, April 2005
"Civil and Criminal Liability";
I Mo. Environmental Law, § 4, MoBar 2d ed. 1998
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.