Saint Louis University School of Law,
J.D., magna cum laude, 2006
Order of the Woolsack, 2006
Saint Louis University,
Honors B.A. (English), magna cum laude, 2003
Minor in Psychology, 2003
Recipient of the Helen Mandeville Prize in English, 2003
Recipient of the James D. Collins Award for Excellence in Student Academic Achievement in English, 2003
District of Columbia
District of Columbia USDC
US Ct Appeals, 9th Circuit (AZ, CA, HI, ID, MT, NV, OR, WA, Guam, M. Isles)
US Ct Appeals, DC Circuit
US Supreme Ct
Washington, D.C., Chapter of WTS International
Vice President, 2020-2021
American Public Transportation Association
Transportation Research Board
Standing Committee on Transit and Intermodal Transportation Law
Included in "Washington D.C. Super Lawyers" Rising Stars list, 2014-2016
Thompson Coburn LLP
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA)
Vice President and Deputy General Counsel, 2019-2022
Thompson Coburn LLP
Summer Associate, 2005
Saint Louis University, Office of the General Counsel
Legal Extern, 2006
Simon Passanante P.C.
Law Clerk, 2004
Katie advises public transit agencies around the country on a variety of regulatory and compliance issues, including public sector procurement, project delivery, Buy America compliance, safety oversight, Title VI, and Section 13(c) labor protection. She is the co-chair of Thompson Coburn's national Public Transit practice.
Clients appreciate Katie's conscientious, thoughtful manner and her ability to calmly handle stressful situations. She focuses on the business goals of her clients when providing guidance and tracks legal developments in the transportation industry to help clients understand their impact on transit operations, projects and activities.
Katie gained new insights on the inner workings of transit agencies while serving as Vice President and Deputy General Counsel of the Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority (WMATA), operator of the third largest heavy rail transit and sixth largest bus system in the United States. She played a direct role in managing daily legal operations for an agency with a $4.7 billion budget, more than 12,000 employees, and a capital improvement program with 6-year investments totaling $12.3 billion. Katie advised on legal issues in every area of the agency's activities, including procurement, capital project delivery, safety oversight, labor and employment, and ethics. She served as a key member of WMATA's senior management team responding to unprecedented operational, fiscal, health, and safety challenges raised by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Katie has guided clients in proceedings before federal courts, private arbitrators, and administrative bodies. She represented the State of California in its successful challenge to the U.S. Department of Labor's denial of Section 13(c) certification to California transit agencies based on the State's enactment of pension reform legislation. She also represented a cruise line association in testing local municipal passenger fees against the limits on such fees set by the Tonnage Clause of the U.S. Constitution. She has authored Supreme Court briefs on constitutional issues affecting transportation clients and tackled complex legal issues before a variety of decision makers.
The Constitution, the Supreme Court, and the Independence of Regulatory Agencies: A Look at the Funding of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau
The changing landscape of domestic preferences for federal infrastructure projects under BABA
Supreme Court to decide limits of attorney client privilege: Why the Ninth Circuit decision spells disaster for the sanctity of legal advice
Bankruptcy Code § 363(m) is now up for interpretation at the U.S. Supreme Court
Supreme Court rules section 363(m) limitations on bankruptcy sale appeals not jurisdictional
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.