On January 5, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) proposed an all-encompassing new rule to bar employers from using non-compete clauses in employee contracts. The proposed rule decrees it “an unfair method of competition for an employer to  enter into or attempt to enter into a non-compete clause with a worker;  maintain with a worker a non-compete clause; or  represent to a worker that the worker is subject to a non-compete clause….” And to avoid any gamesmanship or clever contract drafting, the proposal bars de facto non-compete clauses as well, where, for example, a non-disclosure agreement or training repayment agreement functionally “precludes the worker from working in the same field after the conclusion of the worker’s employment with the employer.”
In addition, this far-reaching proposal is retroactive. As drafted, it would require the rescission of any applicable non-compete clauses entered into prior to the issuance of the proposed rule, and those rescissions must be done within 180 days after publication of the final rule. Moreover, any employer rescinding a non-compete clause must provide an individualized written or digital notice informing both former and current workers that the non-compete clause is no longer effective.
According to the FTC’s announcement, “[a]bout one in five American workers—approximately 30 million people—are bound by a non-compete clause and are thus restricted from pursuing better employment opportunities.” In a January 11, 2023, conference call regarding the new rule, the FTC Director of the Office of Policy Planning, Elizabeth Wilkins, stated that the proposal’s purpose was to shift some labor market power towards employees, as the FTC estimated that employer monopsony power over employees may be depressing wages by up to 20%. Wilkins opined that the proposed rule would reach as far as allowed by the FTC’s jurisdiction to regulate “unfair competition” and would encompass both employees and independent contractors at all job types and income levels. She did note that the FTC is seeking comment on whether lines should be drawn differently on these issues, and it has been reported elsewhere that the FTC is specifically seeking comment on whether noncompetes for senior executives should be exempt or subject to a rebuttable presumption of unlawfulness.
While the rule is broadly written, it has a few noted exceptions. It will not apply to banks or non-profits (they are outside FTC jurisdiction), nor to business-to-business non-compete agreements or to non-compete agreements related to the sale of a business, as long as the business holder at issue owns at least 25% of the sold entity. Director Wilkins explained that this 25% threshold was included to close potential loopholes regarding stockholding employees, but again noted that the FTC is interested in comments on the wording and function of this exception.
The FTC is currently accepting comments on the proposed rule, and the comment period is open through March 10, 2023. Contact Ed Harvey, Nicole Williams, or Tom Groeller with any questions about the proposed rule and possible comments.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.