Northwestern University School of Law,
J.D., cum laude, 2005, Editor, Northwestern University Law Review
University of Wisconsin-Madison,
B.S., Political Science, English, 2000
California
Colorado
New York
Recognized in Southern California Super Lawyers Rising Stars list, 2016-2018 (by Thomson Reuters)
Readers Choice Award in Data Privacy
JD Supra, 2021 (by JD Supra, LLC)
Listed in The Best Lawyers in America® (by BL Rankings), 2025
Luke is an experienced commercial litigator who solves complicated business problems for financial services, telecommunications, manufacturing, and retailer clients.
Luke defends clients in consumer class actions alleging unfair and deceptive practices and false advertising relating to customer agreements and disclosures, product labeling, print and media advertising, and online sales. The damages at issue in these lawsuits has ranged from hundreds of thousands to tens of millions of dollars.
Luke represents clients in commercial disputes, including breaches of contract, leasing, negligence, intentional and negligent misrepresentation, and trade-secret theft, among others. In both litigation and arbitration, Luke uses effective and efficient strategies to further his clients' business needs and goals.
As an experienced financial services litigator, Luke also defends financial institutions in lawsuits across the country brought under various state and federal consumer protection statutes. These lawsuits have challenged financial institutions' practices relating to account and loan fees, loan origination, servicing, debt collection, foreclosure, and unfair and deceptive lending practices.
Luke is also found at the forefront of data and cybersecurity issues. He holds a CIPP/US certification from the International Association of Privacy Professionals, and provides comprehensive advice on litigation risks related to federal and state data privacy laws, including the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA).
Representation of financial services company in lawsuit alleging tortious interference with plaintiff's factoring agreement with an entity in which the company had a significant investment. Obtained complete summary judgment on claims seeking over $11 million. Affirmed on appeal.
Representation of real estate development company in lawsuit alleging breach of fiduciary duty relating to misappropriation of key assets.
Representation of introducing broker in negligence and breach of duty claims arising from alleged account liquidation.
Representation of global manufacturing solutions company in numerous seven-figure arbitrations with customers and suppliers.
Representation of clothing manufacturer in U.S. proceedings arising from alleged foreign trademark infringement.
Representation of manufacturer of laboratory equipment in contract dispute with supplier.
Representation of advertising technology company in contract dispute with third-party software developer.
Representation of real estate development company in lawsuit alleging trade-secret theft.
Representation of major mortgage servicers and lenders in individual and putative class action lawsuits alleging various lending violations, origination fraud, loan-servicing errors, premises liability, and title issues.
Representation of major telecommunications company in putative class action alleging false advertising and unfair competition claims relating to telecommunications services.
Representation of major telecommunications company in putative class action under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.
Representation of community bank in putative class action alleging improperly-assessed and collected overdraft fees.
Representation of retail restaurant chain in putative class action alleging false advertising and unfair competition claims relating to food-delivery fees.
Representation of food manufacturer in putative class action alleging false advertising and unfair competition claims relating to food labeling.
Representation of online retailer in claims involving online presentation of discounted pricing.
Advising major sales and marketing company on California privacy laws as applied to significant California marketing campaign.
Advising major consultancy firm on the privacy and security aspects of its contracting processes with its customers that collect consumer information.
Advising insurance client on California privacy laws as applied to its California-based operations.
California's Journey to Regulate Technology: September 2024 Legislative Update
Fifteen Attorneys General Ask Congress Not to Replace State Privacy Laws With Federal Law
California AG Announces Second Settlement Under the California Consumer Privacy Act
California Chamber Seeks State Supreme Court Review of Privacy Act Enforcement
CPPA’s Deputy Director of Enforcement Promises Vigorous Action by Expanded Enforcement Staff
FTC issues fine to GoodRx over information sharing
California issues first fine under CCPA
Utah and Connecticut enact comprehensive data privacy laws
How Privacy Requirements Impact AI
10 Ways To Avoid Cyber & Privacy Lawsuits
Complying with the Revised FTC Safeguards Rule: Lessons from the New York Experience
The Revised FTC Safeguards Rule - What It Means and Why It Is More Important Than You Might Think
California Privacy: CCPA and Beyond
Election Day Impacts for Cyber and Privacy
Protecting the Ever-Increasing Endpoints in Higher Education
In the Cyber Cross-hairs: Protecting High-Profile Targets
CCPA for Financial Institutions
Using GDPR to Prepare for CCPA, and Vice-Versa
Federal court rules that bank doesn’t have to reimburse fraudulent Zelle transfers
Author, "Court Challenges to Web Tracking Tools Raise Crucial Questions'
Bloomberg Law, December 8, 2023
Author, "New California Agency Sets Enforcement Priorities for Privacy,"
Bloomberg Law, August 25, 2023
"On Compliance: Should Your Credit Union Be A Plaintiff In A Data Breach Class Action Suit?,"
Credit Union Management, publication of the Credit Union Executives Society (CUES), July 2019
Chapter 19,
Consumer Financial Services Answer Book, 2022
NOTICE.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that
doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited
information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information
about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from
us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.