Saint Louis University School of Law,
University of Iowa,
B.S., Mechanical Engineering, 1989
Minor, Business Administration, 1990
US Patent and Trademark Office
Illinois USDC, Central District
Illinois USDC, Southern District
Michigan USDC, Eastern District
Missouri USDC, Eastern District
US Ct Appeals, 7th Circuit (Covers IL, IN, WI)
US Ct Appeals, 8th Circuit (AR, IA, MN, MO, NE, ND, SD)
US Ct Appeals, Federal Circuit
The American Intellectual Property Law Association
The American Bar Association
Bar Association of Metropolitan St. Louis
Named Lawyer of the Year for First Amendment Litigation in St. Louis (by BL Rankings), 2022-2023
Listed in "The Best Lawyers in America®" (by BL Rankings)
Intellectual Property Litigation, 2019-2024
First Amendment Litigation, 2021-2024
First Amendment Law, 2024
Media Law, 2024
Patent Litigation, 2024
F. Wm. McCalpin Pro Bono Award, Legal Services of Eastern Missouri, 2021
Thompson Coburn LLP
Holland, Groves, Schneller & Stolze, LLC
Mike focuses his practice on intellectual property litigation, including patent, media, advertising, copyright, trade secret, privacy and data breach actions. Mike regularly represents clients in U.S. district and state courts across the country. He is one of the founders of Thompson Coburn's In Focus photo copyright blog. Mike received his undergraduate degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Iowa and is licensed to practice before the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office.
"No more half measures: pleading infringer knowledge in contributory copyright infringement claims,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, September 24, 2021
"All Animals are Equal: Eighth Circuit Reverses Dismissal of First Amendment Challenge to Arkansas Ag-Gag Law,"
MLRC MediaLawLetter, September 2021
"Eighth Circuit: Post-Complaint Hyperlink to Unchanged Story Constitutes a Republication, May Show Actual Malice,"
MLRC MediaLawLetter, September 2021
“Too infringing to bear: NY court sides with photographer in suit over embedded image,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, August 3, 2021
“Contributory copyright infringement: Can you ever know what you don’t know?,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, May 18, 2021
“Hard-fought copyright case produces just $750 award,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, March 18, 2021
"Survey of Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals Privacy and Related Claims Against the Media,"
MLRC 50-State Survey 2021-22: Media Privacy & Related Law, February 2021
Co-Author, “Amazon and U.S. IPR Center Announce “Operation Fulfilled Action,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, December 3, 2020
"Game, set, match: Sometimes the photo is the story,"
ThompsonCoburn.com, November 6, 2020
"Graffiti artists see victory under Visual Artists Rights Act Claim,"
ThompsonCoburn.com, October 14, 2020
"Not a bargain at twice the price: Court awards attorneys' fees to victorious copyright defendant,"
ThompsonCoburn.com, September 16, 2020
"Small photo credit removal may result in big damages,"
ThompsonCoburn.com, September 14, 2020
"Eighth Circuit Finds Unique Fact Scenario Is "Just Enough" to Identify Libel Plaintiff,"
MLRC MediaLawLetter, August 2020
“Air ball! Court rejects shot at copyright claim for NBA player tattoos,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, April 3, 2020
“If they litigate, you can only try to mitigate statutory damages,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, February 19, 2020
“CASE Act promises fast track for small copyright claims, but is it the right track?,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, December 11, 2019
“The bell tolls for alleged copyright claim to skyline photo,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, October 31, 2019
“Appellate Court leaves open question of good faith in copyright litigation,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, June 24, 2019
“Montana court finds copyright lawsuit is all hat, no cattle,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, April 25, 2019
“Can an artist deem his own art worthy of protection?,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, March 28, 2019
“Supreme Court rules copyright claimants must begin later, get less,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, March 5, 2019
“Willie’s Creative Commons lesson: The essential attribution requirement,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, March 1, 2019
"Circuit split alert: U.S. Supreme Court to decide key copyright lawsuit precondition,"
ThompsonCoburn.com, July 3, 2018
"In infringement, sometimes the little things don’t mean a lot,"
ThompsonCoburn.com, May 21, 2018
Co-Author, "Studies discuss difficulty of combatting disinformation,"
ThompsonCoburn.com, March 28, 2018
Co-Author, "Can embedding a tweet make you a copyright infringer?,"
ThompsonCoburn.com, March 19, 2018
"Enforce your repeat infringer policy,"
ThompsonCoburn.com, February 13, 2018
"Grumpy Cat still grumpy despite big copyright verdict,"
ThompsonCoburn.com, January 31, 2018
"Fair use is never simple,"
ThompsonCoburn.com, September 26, 2017
"Is 2 seconds of television time too much to be a fair use?,"
ThompsonCoburn.com, August 22, 2017
"Update: Court finds transformative nature of alleged infringing work can’t be decided by side-by-side comparison,"
ThompsonCoburn.com, August 10, 2017
"Court holds that displaying photos requires more than making them available,"
ThompsonCoburn.com, June 27, 2017
“Fair use blocks out copyright claim over LeBron’s tattoo,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, June 1, 2017
“Third verse same as the first - Will Richard Prince’s transformation defense work yet again?,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, May 8, 2017
“Will a court recognize ‘aerosol artists’?,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, April 28, 2017
“Photographer hits retailer over photo of player hitting Joey Bats,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, March 20, 2017
Co-Author, “Copyright Office changes procedures for DMCA agent designations,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, December 9, 2016
“Trump Skittles tweet illustrates photo copyright hazards,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, October 31, 2016
Co-Author, “Street artist’s copyright infringement claims against Starbucks dismissed,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, July 21, 2016
“Fox News fair use claim for Facebook post of 9-11 image remains unresolved,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, July 7, 2016
Co-Author, “Is appropriation art ‘fair use’?,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, June 28, 2016
“Can you make an infringement claim over thumbnail images?,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, May 12, 2016
“Final really does mean final in the Federal Circuit,”
ThompsonCoburn.com, December 18, 2013
Co-Author, "Advertising Law: It's Not Your Father's First Amendment,"
The St. Louis Bar Journal, Fall 2013
Co-Author, “Missouri Recognizes Right to Deliver Unwanted Speech,”
American Bar Association Section of Litigation, First Amendment and Media Litigation Committee website, July 25, 2012
“United States: The Bar Won’t Be Lowered: U.S. Supreme Court Affirms That Clear And Convincing Evidence Is Always Required To Invalidate A U.S. Patent,”
Mondaq.com, December 13, 2011
Missouri Bar Media Law Handbook, 2009
Co-Author, “Third-Party Bad Faith Litigation in Missouri,”
The St. Louis Bar Journal, Fall 1999
"Legal Risks of Online Conversations,"
Lorman Education Services, Webinar, 2021
“Five Legal Issues You Should Consider,”
Missouri Broadcasters Association, 2021 Convention, Branson, MO, August 7, 2021
"Talking About Your IP Rights,"
Thompson Coburn, Webinar, St. Louis, MO, 2020
"A Little Bit About a Few Things..."
Missouri Broadcasters Association, 2019 Convention
"Staying Legal & Credible in the Age of Misinformation,"
#MDMC19 - Midwest Digital Marketing Conference, St. Louis, MO, 2019
"Legal Background of Influencer & Social Media Marketing,"
#MDMC18 - Midwest Digital Marketing Conference, St. Louis, MO, 2018
"Federal Circuit Year in Review,"
Bar Association of Metropolitan of St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, 2018
"Legal Risks of Online Conversations,"
Lorman Education Services, Webinar, 2018
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.