Section 232 is a mechanism under the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 that allows the U.S. government to evaluate the effect of imports on national security. On February 16, the United States Department of Commerce (“Commerce”) published Section 232 reports detailing its findings pertaining to steel and aluminum imports. The reports identified a national security threat posed by the importation of certain steel mill products, as well as certain wrought and unwrought aluminum, and recommended the imposition of a 24 percent duty on imported steel and a 7.7 percent duty on imported aluminum.
President Trump responded on March 1, announcing the Administration’s plan to impose a 25 percent tariff on the steel products and a 10 percent tariff on the aluminum products identified in the reports, and issued proclamations to implement these duties on March 8, 2018. The duties are set to apply to steel and aluminum that is entered or withdrawn from warehouse for consumption beginning on March 23, 2018. Given the length of time it takes for shipments to arrive in the U.S. from some nations, the tariffs will likely apply to steel and aluminum that is already on the water, creating immediate issues that may need to be addressed.
With respect to steel, the Presidential Proclamation imposed a 25 percent duty on the following articles:
Specifically excluded from the Section 232 steel tariffs are the following:
With respect to the aluminum, the Presidential Proclamation signed on March 8, 2018, imposes a 10 percent duty on all of the following articles:
Importers should take care and note that the Section 232 tariffs are in addition to any duties already imposed on the named articles, including any antidumping and countervailing duties.
Only Canada and Mexico are currently exempted, pending the outcome of ongoing NAFTA negotiations. In the long term, any country in which the U.S. has a security relationship (essentially NATO countries) may be exempted from the orders if they arrive at a “satisfactory alternative means to address the threat to the national security, such that the president determines that imports from that country no longer threaten to impair the national security,” per the proclamations.
The proclamations include the ability to shape the trade restrictions going forward. A system is to be established to allow directly affected parties in the U.S. to request the exclusion of certain products that are determined not to be produced in a sufficient and reasonably available amount (or of a satisfactory quality) in the United States or, alternatively, to provide relief for national security reasons. Procedures for requesting exclusions are to be published within 10 days of the date of the proclamations. Notices of the exclusion of articles are to be published in the Federal Register. The Secretary of Commerce can also indicate further actions to be considered, including the elimination of the duties proposed by the order.
With the exception of the fact that these duties will be applied to goods entered or withdrawn from warehouse on March 23, 2018, the consequences of these proclamations and the details of their implementation currently remain unclear. Internationally, the proclamations are facing significant backlash, with several nations claiming that the U.S. is using the guise of national security as a pretext for the imposition of protectionist tariffs in contravention of the WTO Agreements. It is anticipated that other countries will retaliate against the actions of the United States by imposing higher duties on certain U.S. goods. The goals of these countries will be to impose tariffs in a way that will have the maximum impact on the domestic politics of the United States (e.g., Harley Davidson motorcycles because of the potential impact on Congressman Paul Ryan; bourbon because of the impact on Senator Mitch McConnell; and agricultural products because of the potential impact on what is perceived to be the president’s base of supporters). At the same time, U.S. allies are looking for a mechanism to have their products excluded. This tension will be a likely topic of international discussion for several weeks. Thompson Coburn will be monitoring developments in this area and will publish additional alerts as information becomes available.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.