On February 3, 2022, the Illinois Supreme Court ruled in McDonald v. Symphony Bronzeville Park, LLC,  that the exclusivity provisions of the Illinois Workers’ Compensation Act (“Compensation Act”) do not preempt employees’ claims for statutory damages against their employers under the Illinois Biometric Information Privacy Act (“BIPA”). This long-awaited decision effectively nullifies the preemption defense under the Compensation Act and will only serve to bolster the onslaught of claims alleging technical violations of BIPA in the employment context.
In McDonald, the employee alleged, on behalf of herself and a putative class, that her former employer violated various provisions of BIPA by utilizing a biometric time-clock system that scanned employees’ fingerprints without (i) properly notifying them of the specific purpose and length of time for which their fingerprints were being collected, stored, and used; (ii) providing a publicly available retention policy, or (iii) obtaining their written consent to the fingerprint scans.
The Circuit Court of Cook County concluded that the employee could pursue her claims on behalf of the putative class, instead of through a claim before the Workers’ Compensation Commission, because the employee’s and putative class’s alleged injury was not one that “categorically fits within the purview of the [Compensation] Act.” The Illinois Appellate Court for the First Judicial District affirmed the Circuit Court’s decision, and the Illinois Supreme Court decided to hear the case to determine whether BIPA injuries are compensable under the Compensation Act, thus rendering civil lawsuits for such injuries barred by the Compensation Act’s exclusivity provision.
The Illinois Supreme Court’s decision agreed with the First District’s decision, holding that alleged privacy injuries in claims for statutory damages under BIPA are “not compensable”, primarily because they cannot be characterized as either psychological or physical work injuries. McDonald, 2022 IL 126511, 12, 2022 WL 318649, *3 (Feb. 3, 2022) (citing Treadwell v. Power Solutions International, Inc., 427 F. Supp. 3d 984 (N.D. Ill. 2019)). Accordingly, the exclusivity provision in the Compensation Act does not bar such claims.
Impacts to employers
Before the Illinois Supreme Court’s decision, the Compensation Act was one of the last major defenses available to employers defending BIPA claims. Aside from largely making this defense unavailable, McDonald has significant implications for the BIPA litigation landscape and employers defending BIPA claims.
Ryan Gehbauer, Libby Casale and Dremain Moore are associates in Thompson Coburn’s Business Litigation group.
Ill. Justices Say Workers' Comp Law Doesn't Bar BIPA Claims - Law360
McDonald v. Symphony Bronzeville Park, LLC, 2022 IL 126511 (law360.com)
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.