In a case with far reaching implications for equipment lessors, the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York in the Republic Airways bankruptcy case has held that a liquidated damages provision in a lease that requires the lessee to pay the lessor for a decline in the market value of equipment upon the lessee’s default is unenforceable.
The specific leases at issue in the case involved aircraft, but included a liquidated damages provision commonly used in many types of equipment finance leases. These provisions shift the economic risk of a decline in the market value of the equipment to the lessee upon the lessee’s default. In the event of a default, the lessee is required to pay the lessor any unpaid rent under the lease, plus the difference between the so-called “stipulated loss value” (SLV) of the equipment and the then fair market value of the equipment. Absent the lessee’s default, however, the risk of a decline in the market value of the equipment remains with the lessor and the lessee is simply obligated to return the equipment to the lessee at the end of the lease term.
The Court concluded that such a risk-shifting liquidated damages provision is unenforceable under Section 2A-504 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC), which provides that damages “may be liquidated in a lease agreement but only at an amount or by a formula that is reasonable in light of the then anticipated harm caused by the default.” The Court explained that such a provision is not reasonable in light of the then anticipated harm caused by the default because it transfers “residual value risk, or market risk, [to the lessee] only upon default, without a cognizable connection to any anticipated harm cause by the default itself.” According to the Court, “the plain language in Article 2A, Section 504 mandates a causal link between the anticipated harm and the act of default. . . . [Thus,] while the statute may permit some form of indemnification for risk to residual value, such indemnification can only cover damages or loss to the residual value that is linked to default, rather than by uncorrelated market forces.”
It should be noted that the disparity between the amount of the unpaid rent and the amount of liquidated damages under the leases at issue in the case was very large and may have played a role in the Court’s decision. For example, under one of the leases the remaining unpaid rent was approximately $120,000 while the liquidated damages were approximately $5.7 million.
As a result of the Court’s decision in Republic Airways, and various other recent cases in which risk-shifting liquidated damages provisions have come under fire, equipment lessors may want to reconsider their reliance on such provisions. Thompson Coburn attorneys are available for consultation regarding these and any other equipment leasing issues. For those who would like to learn more, please contact Eileen Brown, Ruthanne Hammett, or Margie Krumholz.
The case is In re Republic Airways Holdings Inc., et al, Case No. 16-10429, United States Bankruptcy Court, Southern District of New York (February 14, 2019), and can be found here.
Mark Bossi is co-chair of Thompson Coburn’s Financial Restructuring Group.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an â€˜engagement letterâ€™).
By clicking the â€˜ACCEPTâ€™ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the â€˜ACCEPTâ€™ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.