On November 13, 2017, the U.S Department of Education began the process of overhauling a complex and controversial Obama-era regulation commonly referred to as the “borrower defense” rule.
During this process, which will continue well into next year, the Department will revisit the standards and processes pursuant to which borrowers can seek to discharge their federal loans based on institutional misconduct, as well as the standards and processes pursuant to which the Department can seek to recover discharged amounts from schools. In addition, the Department will consider revising closed-school and false certification discharge provisions, expanding financial responsibility standards, and updating the institutional composite score calculation. With few exceptions, this rule will apply to all institutions of higher education.
Thompson Coburn Partner Aaron Lacey was appointed by the Department as one of the primary negotiators tasked with reworking the rule, charged specifically with negotiating on behalf of “general counsels, attorneys, and compliance officers” at institutions of higher education. In November, Aaron participated in the first round of rulemaking, joining a group that includes student and consumer advocates, agency representatives, accreditors, financial aid administrators, and business officers, as well as representatives from different types of institutions of higher education. The negotiators will reconvene again in January and February.
This first webinar in the series will update postsecondary attorneys and compliance officers on the progress of the rulemaking, and to provide additional detail regarding the key issues discussed during the first session, held November 13-15, 2017.
The live presentation of this program was approved for 1.5 hours general CLE credit in California and Illinois and 1.8 hours of general CLE credit in Missouri. CLE credit is no longer available for this recording.
*Please note that this is a 90-minute presentation
December 13, 2017
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.