In late June, a New Jersey jury found a major product manufacturer liable for patent infringement, breach of contract, and misappropriation of idea, and awarded over $11 million in damages to Thompson Coburn’s clients, plaintiffs Marni Markell and her company Nite Glow Industries. The jury also found the infringement to be willful.
Nearly a decade ago, Markell, a prolific inventor with over 50 patents to her name, many of which are in the pet care space, became acquainted with Four Paws, a subsidiary of defendant Central Garden and Pet, a Fortune 1000 company. She was invited to present several of her inventions to the subsidiary in May 2009. At the time of the meeting, representatives from Four Paws signed a non-disclosure agreement. One of the products that Markell presented was a flea and tick medication applicator, which greatly interested Four Paws; there was no similar product currently on the market.
Following that presentation, the president of Four Paws told Markell that they “had a deal.” Markell’s prototype and product designs were sent to Central Garden and Pet’s subsidiary Central Life Sciences, which handles pet medications. All of these actions were taken under the NDA. After a series of meetings, the president of Central Life Sciences failed to contact Markell regarding plans to take the product to market. She assumed things were stalled and waited.
In March 2012, Markell attended the Global Pet Expo, where she was shocked to discover the flea and tick applicator that she designed was the star of the show. She immediately contacted the president of Four Paws, who assured her the issue would be fixed and that she would be paid proper royalties. After several months with no further action, Markell filed a suit in June 2012 against Central Garden and Pet and its Four Paws subsidiary.
Markell had read about Thompson Coburn’s success representing another pet care product inventor in patent infringement litigation, and in July 2015, after three years of litigation, she hired Thompson Coburn to represent her.
On June 27, 2018, after nearly a month-long trial in Nite Glow Industries Inc. et al v. Central Garden & Pet Company et al before the U.S. District Court of New Jersey, the jury returned a verdict finding that Central Garden & Pet Company willfully infringed Nite Glow’s patent. The jury also found Central liable for state law claims of breach of agreement and misappropriation of idea. The damages award exceeded $11 million.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an â€˜engagement letterâ€™).
By clicking the â€˜ACCEPTâ€™ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the â€˜ACCEPTâ€™ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.