The Higher Education Act (HEA) was signed into law in 1965 by President Lyndon Johnson as part of his Great Society initiative. It is the basic federal law intended to increase accessibility to higher education by all. About 75% of all federal higher education student aid flows through HEA programs. Like most federal laws, Congress periodically will reauthorize the HEA and we are in the midst of the ninth reauthorization. While the major players in the House and Senate are publicly committed to reauthorizing the HEA this year, the question is, will they get the job done before or have to start over when the new Congress convenes next January?
A reauthorization makes some amendments to the HEA. Some are major and some are tweaks. For example, the 1992 amendments made students enrolled in distance education courses eligible for the first time to receive federal student aid loans and grants. The HEA has been reauthorized 1968, 1972, 1976, 1980, 1986, 1992, 1998, and 2008.
For the past several years, the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) and the House Education and the Workforce (EdW) Committees have held hearings on a variety of higher education issues including regulatory simplification, streamlining the process for both applying and repaying student loans, and improving completion rates, transparency and institutional accountability, to name several areas of interest.
The House of Representatives: Following multiple hearings over the past several years, in mid-December, on a party line vote of 23 Republicans against 17 Democrats, the EdW Committee adopted the Promoting Real Opportunity, Success, and Prosperity through Education Reform or PROSPER Act, a comprehensive update of the HEA. The bill reflects the views of the Committee’s GOP majority, led by Chairwoman Virginia Foxx (R-NC) and Chairman Brett Guthrie (R-KY) of the Subcommittee on Higher Education and Workforce Development who authored the legislation with little if any Democratic input. Reforms are significant because, according to the Committee’s summary of the PROSPER Act, the HEA “is no longer working for postsecondary students and “the American workforce faces a shortage of 6 million skilled workers.” Therefore, “Reforms must be made to assist students in completing an affordable higher education that will prepare them to enter the workforce with the skills they need to be successful.” The summary goes on to say that the PROSPER Act tackles these challenges by
Some of the of the bill’s changes include:
The next step in the legislative process for the PROSPER Act is consideration by the full House of Representatives. The process will include a “Manager’s Amendment” by Chairwoman Foxx proposing modifications to the Committee passed bill, likely a package of amendments spearheaded by the Committee’s top Democrat, Rep. Bobby Scott (D-VA), and some amendments from other Committee members as well. The latest word is that full House could take up the PROSPER Act in mid-March or early April.
The Senate: The House EdW Committee took the lead on HEA reauthorization in 2017 because the Senate HELP Committee was primarily focused on repeal and replacement of Obamacare. With that effort ended for now, HELP has stepped up its HEA reauthorization efforts and is now hard at work on reauthorization.
On February 1, 2018, HELP Committee Chairman Alexander (R-TN) released a GOP staff white paper on “Higher Education Accountability” providing an overview of current higher education accountability measures and consideration of some ideas for updating them. The goal, according to the paper, is to “Update the federal accountability measures for institutions of higher education to ensure that students are receiving an education worth their time and money” with the strategy to “Modernize and simplify the federal requirements for institutions of higher education to participate in the federal student loan program by creating more effective accountability measures focused on the repayment of federal student loans.”
Senate HELP Democrats quickly countered with a broader “Higher Education Act Reauthorization Principles”
Like EdW, the HELP Committee also held a number of hearings over the past few years but stepped up its reauthorization focus over the last few months with hearings on simplifying the FASFA simplification in November 2017 and January 2018, a January 25 hearing on access and innovation, a January 30 hearing on accountability and risk sharing or skin-in-the-game, and a February 6 hearing on improving college affordability.
The HELP Committee has a history of bipartisan cooperation, made all the more important by its current make up of 12 GOP and 11 Democratic members. In a move perhaps foreshadowing more bipartisanship Chairman Alexander and Ranking Murray on February 13 issued an invitation with a February 23 submission deadline calling for comments or suggestions for the Committee’s consideration during reauthorization. Chairman Alexander has said to expect a reauthorization bill in “early spring.” While both Alexander and Ranking Member Murray have spoken about a bipartisan bill, it remains to be seen if that goal can be accomplished.
The conventional wisdom by the many of the “experts” in Washington, DC is that while the House may pass the PROSPER Act in the next month or two, there is simply not enough time between now and the mid-term elections in November for the Senate’s HELP Committee to write, debate and send a reauthorization bill for a vote by the full Senate and then go to a conference with the House to hammer out the differences between the PROSPER and whatever the Senate passes and pass that through both bodies. Moreover, if the Democrats believe they have a strong chance of taking back control of one or both houses of Congress after the election, they might choose to drag their feet on reauthorization in the belief that they can get a bill in the new Congress that tips more heavily toward their priorities. Time and the elections will tell.
If I were handicapping the outcome, I think the odds favor that reauthorization will not reach the President’s desk for signature by year’s end. But Senators Alexander and Murray are exceptional legislators with a history of working together and getting things done. It is hard to bet against them. It is also illuminating that the last HEA reauthorization passed and became law in an election year. Will the past prologue?
Reprinted with permission from Edu Alliance Journal (February 2018)
Ken Salomon is chair of the Thompson Coburn Lobbying & Policy Group. Over the course of his career, he has provided clients with government relations and public policy services in a broad range of issues, including higher education, intellectual property, telecommunications, e-commerce, financial services, and international trade. Ken is also a member of the Edu Alliance Advisory Council.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.