Under the Hart-Scott-Rodino (“HSR”) Act, companies engaged in certain large transactions, commonly referred to as “mergers” or “acquisitions,” are required to notify the Federal Trade Commission and Department of Justice of certain large impending transactions by filing a prescribed notification and report form. The agencies then generally have 30 days to investigate, during which they can ask for more information (known as a “Second Request”) which extends the waiting period until the companies have substantially complied with the Second Request. If the reviewing agency grants early termination of the 30-day waiting period or does nothing, the transaction may close. The FTC has recently announced, however, that regardless of the expiration of the 30-day waiting period, its investigation of many transactions will remain open. Indefinitely.
Citing “astounding” monthly HSR filing statistics, on August 3, 2021, the Federal Trade Commission issued a blog announcement stating that it has been swamped “by a tidal wave of merger filings that is straining the agency’s capacity to rigorously investigate deals ahead of the statutory deadlines.” Desiring to “be upfront about these capacity constraints,” the agency announced that it will now send standard form letters to HSR filers whose deals cannot be “fully investigate[d]” within the 30 day waiting period. That letter (attached to the announcement) informs companies that “although the waiting period will expire imminently,” the investigation “remains open and ongoing.” The blog post, issued by Holly Vedova, Acting Bureau of Competition Director, concludes with this ominous warning:
Companies that choose to proceed with transactions that have not been fully investigated are doing so at their own risk. Of course, this action should not be construed as a determination that the deal is unlawful, just as the fact that we have not issued such a letter with respect to an HSR filing should not be construed as a determination that a deal is lawful.
In other words, no one should be comfortable that their transaction is lawful simply because the agencies have not objected within the statutory 30-day period.
In one sense, this is nothing new, as the agencies have always retained the right to determine a merger is unlawful after a premerger review. Although post-merger challenges have been less frequent than premerger challenges, the “close at your own risk” letter announcement, combined with a recent FTC resolution stating that use of compulsory process to investigate consummated mergers would extend to 10 years, suggests that the post-merger challenge may become a more often used weapon in the FTC’s arsenal. Parties engaged in HSR-level transactions should consider how to address the “close at your own risk” letters in their acquisition agreements. For example, if closing is conditioned on the absence of any open investigations, could a buyer delay closing? Or if closing is contingent on the expiration of the HSR waiting period, could a seller force a closing? Deal terminology going forward will need to be explicit regarding risk allocation under these new “close at your risk” circumstances.
The FTC’s announcement provides no hint of when — if ever — the parties will learn that an investigation is complete. Indeed the FTC’s form letter states that “no determination regarding the lawfulness of the transaction…could be made unless and until the Commission completes its investigation.” If the 2021 “tidal wave” of reportable transactions continues, the HSR filings and theoretical “ongoing investigations” will continue to pile up on the FTC’s shores, and who knows when the agencies will be able to sort through that debris.
Ed Harvey leads Thompson Coburn’s Antitrust Practice Group and serves as antitrust counsel for clients across a broad range of industries.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an ‘engagement letter’).
By clicking the ‘ACCEPT’ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the ‘ACCEPT’ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.