Recent updates to the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force (“Task Force”) guidance increases the scope of employees covered by the Task Force guidance to include a covered contractor’s affiliate’s employees in many instances.
As we noted previously, the COVID safety protocols required by Executive Order 14042 (Executive Order on Ensuring Adequate COVID Safety Protocols for Federal Contractors) are generally implemented through solicitation and contract clauses that require compliance with Task Force guidance. This means a company and its employees are not subject to the protocols unless and until they have an agreement with an applicable clause included within a contract.
The Task Force has issued its guidance, and agencies have not only publicized their deviation clauses, they are actively including them in solicitations, contracts, and modifications. Notably, those deviation clauses generally include the following language:
Compliance. The Contractor shall comply with all guidance, including guidance conveyed through Frequently Asked Questions, as amended during the performance of this contract, for contractor or subcontractor workplace locations published by the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force (Task Force Guidance) at https:/www.saferfederalworkforce.gov/contractors/.
November 1 amendments to the Task Force guidance adds certain employees of a covered contractor’s affiliates into the scope of covered contractor employees. Such “covered contractor employees” are individuals covered by the vaccine and other mandates.
In particular, the Task Force guidance says “an employee of a corporate affiliate of a covered contractor is considered a covered contractor employee if the employee performs work at a covered contractor workplace.” (We previously explained what locations are “covered contractor workplace locations” here). The guidance considers companies to be “affiliates” if “directly or indirectly: (i) either one controls or has the power to control the other; or (ii) a third party controls or has the power to control both.”
We expect that this amendment may result in a much broader impact to commercial companies that receive only a portion of their work from the Federal Government.
Amendments like this one are a reminder of the importance of (1) covered contractors regularly checking the Safer Federal Workforce Task Force’s Frequently Asked Questions; and (2) considering and addressing the costs involved in complying with amendments to Task Force guidance when posed with a potential contract clause or modification.
Jayna Marie Rust is an associate in Thompson Coburn’s Washington, D.C. office. She counsels clients on Federal contract- and grant-administration matters, including analyzing and negotiating subcontractor and joint-venture agreements and following small-business requirements. She also represents Government contractors in claims, protests, and disputes.
Although we would like to hear from you, we cannot represent you until we know that doing so will not create a conflict of interest. Also, we cannot treat unsolicited information as confidential. Accordingly, please do not send us any information about any matter that may involve you until you receive a written statement from us that we represent you (an â€˜engagement letterâ€™).
By clicking the â€˜ACCEPTâ€™ button, you agree that we may review any information you transmit to us. You recognize that our review of your information, even if you submitted it in a good faith effort to retain us, and, further, even if you consider it confidential, does not preclude us from representing another client directly adverse to you, even in a matter where that information could and will be used against you. Please click the â€˜ACCEPTâ€™ button if you understand and accept the foregoing statement and wish to proceed.